FOLLOWING
THE
controversy
over
gay
marriage
in
the
mainstream
media,
or
even
in
the
gay
press,
you
might
assume
the
gay
community
is
solidly
behind
the
movement
for
same-sex
marriage
rights.
You
might
also
assume
the
gay
community
generally
is
white
or
a
colorblind
“rainbow.”Both
of
these
assumptions
would
be
incorrect.
Of
course,
some
black
gay
men
support
the
movement
for
same-sex
marriage — even
if
they
are
no
more
politically
involved
than
simply
agreeing
that
it
is
a
civil
rights
issue
and
that
people
should
have
the
right
to
love
and
commit
to
whomever
they
chose.
But
for
most
black
gay
men
I
have
spoken
with,
“gay
marriage”
is
only
a
starting
point
to
other
concerns.
Some
of
these
men
argue
the
gay
marriage
agenda
is
just
modeling
same-gender
relationships
after
heterosexual
ones.
They
believe
that
gays
should
be
working
on
a
model
for
same-gender
relationships.
Why
should
heterosexual
relationships
be
a
“template”
for
same-gender
relationships?
It’s
like
meeting
a
masculine,
muscular
long-term
male
couple
and
asking
them,
“Who
plays
the
man,
and
who
plays
the
woman?”
The
answers
are
likely
to
be,
“We’re
both
men”
and,
“We’re
not
playing
anything.”
Perhaps
the
question
should
be
phrased,
“Since
power
is
conventionally
associated
with
masculinity
and
muscles,
how
do
you
negotiate
power
in
your
relationship?”
WOULD
IT
NOT
be
preferable
to
call
the
same-gender
commitments
“civil
unions”
instead
of
“gay
marriage?”
The
phrase
“civil
union”
seems
more
specific
to
same-gender
commitments.
The
phrase
“gay
marriage”
sounds
like
a
parody
of
a
marriage.
A
critic
might
argue
that
“gay
wedding”
is
almost
as
kitschy
or
campy
as
“doggy
wedding.”
Men
or
women
attending
a
“gay
wedding”
may
see
nothing
ridiculous
in
it;
likewise,
people
who
have
funerals
for
their
cats
and
bury
them
in
pet
funerals
may
see
nothing
ridiculous
in
that.
“Civil
union”
definitely
sounds
more
dignified.
Few
of
the
black
men
I
meet
are
in
relationships
where
they
would
even
consider
marriage
or
a
civil
union;
hence,
our
conversations
shift
to,
“Why
aren’t
more
black
men
bonding
in
long-term
relationships?”
The
answer
is
not
because
they
don’t
want
to.
Most
black
gay
men
I
have
met
say
they
want
such
a
long-term
bond.
Many
are
actively
searching.
WHAT
OBSTACLES
DO
black
gay
men
face
in
finding
long-term
relationships?
Is
it
testosterone
that
makes
men
clash?
Does
traditional
male
upbringing
train
us
to
be
the
head
of
our
households,
so
that
two
men
clash
when
they
try
to
have
a
household
together?
Does
internalized
homophobia
cause
men
to
disrespect
and
devalue
their
relationships
and
lovers?
Does
internalized
racism?
During
our
teen
years,
heterosexual
boys
generally
date
several
different
girls
and
learn
through
trial-and-error
our
relationship
styles.
Few
same-gender-loving
people
have
such
opportunities.
Perhaps
the
paucity
of
same-gender
dating
opportunities
doing
those
formative
years
impacts
same-gender-loving
people
when
they
look
for
a
relationship
in
their
adult
lives.
We
should
ask
if
“gay
marriage”
is
really
the
most
important
issue
in
the
struggle
for
equality.
And
who
gets
to
make
that
decision?
The
issue
of
HIV/AIDS
is
another
example
of
different
priorities
for
black
gay
people
and
white
gay
people.
One
San
Francisco
white
gay
newspaper
trumpeted
the
progress
in
the
local
fight
against
HIV/AIDS.
Are
young
black
gay
men
within
this
paper’s
community?
The
HIV/AIDS
infection
rate
among
the
Bay
Area’s
black
gay
males
is
alarming.
Here
in
Oakland,
I’ve
met
HIV-positive
youth.
And
at
Atlanta’s
Black
Pride,
a
19-year
old
nonchalantly
told
me
disturbing
stories
about
HIV/AIDS
and
unsafe
sex
among
his
peers — including
about
how
a
16-year
old
was
infected
the
first
time
he
had
sex.
These
were
the
issues
I
discussed
at
Black
Gay
Pride
events
in
Los
Angeles,
Atlanta
and
Oakland.
Yet
such
issues
are
overshadowed
in
the
national
media.
There,
white
gays
tell
the
world
their
community
is
diverse
or
“rainbow.”
Meanwhile,
white
gays
have
been
setting
the
national
“gay”
agenda.